On Saturday we looked at the whole
question of in this period of flux, who really is in charge? The incumbent
Fawaz, who is selling up, or the incoming Evangelos Marinakis. As we discussed,
Fawaz seems to regard his remaining stake as enough to have a deciding say in
all matters, whilst Marinakis, has the experience and more importantly the
controlling interest to put together the future structure and therefore direction
of Nottingham Forest.
I have been a
defender of Fawaz for his tenure at Forest. Mistakes have been made, all too
frequently, but this is a guy willing and able to spend large sums of cash on
Forest. Without his injection of money 4 years ago, I feel we would have gone
down, as we were skint, and had seen many of our best player’s leave, for fees
proved to a pittance or when their contract wound down.
Marinakis |
So with
Marinakis, we already have discussions of Technical Directors and CEO’s coming
in. People who Fawaz should have installed to stop mistakes like the signings
of the Algerians. With this model, the manager becomes the Head Coach,
recruitment and scouting is done by those further up, and allows an overall
picture and strategy.
Now there is
various names being suggested, and I’m not about to look at whom or what they
are like. Let’s all be honest, with most clubs the various heads of recruitment
or technical directors and not usually house hold names (to us anyway.) What it
does look like being is a European, and that’s an interesting angle. To cast
the scouting net wider will be a huge bonus. Aside from the occasional Moussi
type signing we never really dipped our toes into the European market too
heavily as much as some clubs at our level.
But having a
“Football Man” to make these decisions in a more structured way rather than the
Fawaz approach, which aside from O’Driscoll has always been take whoever
is out of work and therefore cheap. To start chasing employed managers that
would need compensation fee paying goes against the Fawaz grain.
It’s by no means been said that this
will be part of a wider pattern of what’s happening with Championship clubs but
we can’t rule out the sister team approach that certain clubs at this level
have used to mixed success. No doubt Watford benefitted from the Pozzo family
tie ins. Brentford have a relationship with FC Midjtylland (majority
shareholder in common), and then there’s the ill-fated Charlton / Standard
Liege tie in. Whether it is an opportunity to move a stock of players around,
or whether it is just a potential tie in, what’s for sure is Marinakis knows
how to run a successful club.
Marinakis is used to success and trophies |
A proper CEO is also likely to be a must. Fawaz as I said before
liked trying to cut any people out between himself and the manager, preferring
a more hands on approach. Indeed Paul Faulkner was largely bought in to appease
Stuart Pearce, and without Fawaz wanting his direct route to the manager, no
doubt to revel in glories being down to him, instead it has shown up huge short
comings with the club, commercially and financially. Ordinarily such positions
at club have little or no importance to many fans, but with Forest its become a
focal point for identifying a huge problem at the club.
This is without of
course the elephant in the room. Who will be that head Coach? How will it fit
in to a potential new structure with Technical Directors and Directors of Football?
That’s a question to be looked at next.
What does "a criminal organization" means?
ReplyDeletewhere do i mention that? Because i don#t
ReplyDelete